The Rising ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: The Way Affluence and Hardship Now Sit Cheek by Jowl in Across England.
Within Nunsthorpe, residents live in properties only several yards from their wealthier counterparts in nearby Scartho village. One 1.8-metre-high wall literally separates the two communities in the town of Grimsby, sealing off paths and streets that previously linked them.
“It’s the divide between rich and poor,” said a resident, 37. “It has been there for as long as I’ve known. I doubt they’ll take it down because I don’t think they’ll want to mix with us.”
An Increasingly Common National Picture
Data from official statistics reveals how deep disparity can run, at times across nothing more than a few metres of tarmac, a line of hedges or a wall. Decades of budget cuts and underinvestment have led to a situation where almost two-thirds of local authorities now have a locality ranking as one of the poorest in the nation.
This geographical widening of deprivation has led to a significant increase in the number of places where deprived and well-off residents end up living side by side. Just a few years ago, only 65 of the poorest neighbourhoods bordered one of the least deprived. That figure rose to 119 in the most recent data.
A Barrier Which Does More Than Separate Space
At this Lincolnshire site, the gap is the biggest in the country and starkly obvious. The barrier is much more than a symbolic division; it causes tangible problems for daily routines.
- School runs that should take a quarter of an hour turn into an sixty-minute detour.
- Access to key services like supermarkets, educational facilities and care homes is hindered.
- The area can attract vandalism and loitering, with instances of litter being thrown over the wall and other issues.
“You try to have a nice house and nice garden, and then you live opposite that,” noted one local, gesturing towards the corroded barricade.
Local Bonds Amidst Challenges
Within a local community centre, staff stress that support does not recognise addresses. “Your postcode is not a reliable indicator of your personal struggles,” said chief executive Tracey Good.
Regardless of being placed in the lowest 10% for income, employment, education, health and crime, the estate retains a strong sense and sense of togetherness among its inhabitants. Meanwhile, the neighbouring area ranks among the least deprived 10% overall.
A Similar Story: An Estate in Kent
This phenomenon is mirrored across the country. The Stanhope area in Kent, a 1960s housing development, is in the most disadvantaged tenth of areas in England. It is immediately adjacent by spacious detached homes built in the early 2000s that sit in the top 10% for employment and quality of surroundings.
“They may possess larger properties, but here there’s a stronger community,” said Phil Hockley, aged 63. “It’s likely a lot of people in the new builds never even talk to each other.”
The economic gap is evident: an typical three-bedroom house sells for about £275,000 on the Stanhope estate, while across the divide equivalent properties go for about £410,000.
Residents describe a tangible sense of being overlooked. “This part of the community gets ignored,” said resident Susan Riley-Nevers. “In this area our facilities have slowly been taken away, and the majority of the community problems here are to do with financial hardship.”
The rise in these ‘deprivation divides’ presents a picture of an increasingly divided society, where prosperity and deprivation are frequently awkwardly in close proximity.